Template talk:Navbox Pet Commands: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Konoko No edit summary |
imported>Thirty7 |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Pet Commands alternatives == | == Pet Commands alternatives == | ||
=== Current Templates === | |||
{{Navbox Pet Commands}} | |||
{{Navbox Pet Commands Reference}} | |||
=== Experimental === | |||
{{navbox| | {{navbox| | ||
|name = Pet Commands | |name = Navbox Pet Commands | ||
|title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 1 DETAIL | |title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 1 DETAIL | ||
|state = uncollapsed | |||
| group1 = Commanding | | group1 = Commanding | ||
| Line 27: | Line 33: | ||
{{navbox| | {{navbox| | ||
|name = Pet Commands | |name = Navbox Pet Commands | ||
|title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 2 NO DETAIL | |title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 2 NO DETAIL | ||
|state = uncollapsed | |||
| group1 = Commanding | | group1 = Commanding | ||
| Line 53: | Line 60: | ||
{{navbox| | {{navbox| | ||
|name = Pet Commands | |name = Navbox Pet Commands | ||
|title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 3 NO DETAIL no slash | |title = [[Pet Commands]] ALTERNATE 3 NO DETAIL no slash | ||
|state = uncollapsed | |||
| group1 = Commanding | | group1 = Commanding | ||
| Line 77: | Line 85: | ||
| list4 = "{{slashcommand|window_show}} pet" {{dot}} {{bindcommand|petoptions}}<noinclude>{{orange|underscore?}}</noinclude> | | list4 = "{{slashcommand|window_show}} pet" {{dot}} {{bindcommand|petoptions}}<noinclude>{{orange|underscore?}}</noinclude> | ||
}} | }} | ||
== To detail or not to detail == | == To detail or not to detail == | ||
I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 87: | Line 96: | ||
:: 2 for, 1 against. I'm still on the fence. I like mini-references where ever I can put them. But I also like clean looks. Each Slash Command navbox's title should point to a page with the commands in detail anyways. Like [[Pet Commands]] does now (need to add a few, actually). | :: 2 for, 1 against. I'm still on the fence. I like mini-references where ever I can put them. But I also like clean looks. Each Slash Command navbox's title should point to a page with the commands in detail anyways. Like [[Pet Commands]] does now (need to add a few, actually). | ||
:: I also added a no detail, no slash example. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 16:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | :: I also added a no detail, no slash example. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 16:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:: Also, [[User talk:Konoko/Slash Command NavBoxes]], 3 alternatives for current NavBoxes. Without the prefixes, neither plus "+" nor slash "/", the navbox looks clean on Firefox 3 Windows XP. I'm curious what it looks like in other browers. BRB, going to narnia. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 17:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
:: Back from narnia, rendering looked ok on all browers. Which means that it looks just as cluttered or uncluttered -[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] | |||
Shades29A suggested having one detailed, one not. Added second article {{tl|Navbox Pet Commands Reference}}. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 21:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:15, 9 July 2012
Pet Commands alternatives
Current Templates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Experimental
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
To detail or not to detail
I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --Konoko 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd have to say I like the more detailed one, myself. The links make it relatively easy to pick out each command. Just my two cents. --Eabrace 00:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Detailed +1 -- Agge (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd vote against the detailed version. Navboxes are supposed to be for navigation, not information. The more information that you put in, the less easy it is to use for navigation due to increased clutter. Also, the more bloat it puts on the page. With the parameters, it becomes a mini-reference instead of navigation. -- Sekoia 06:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- 2 for, 1 against. I'm still on the fence. I like mini-references where ever I can put them. But I also like clean looks. Each Slash Command navbox's title should point to a page with the commands in detail anyways. Like Pet Commands does now (need to add a few, actually).
- I also added a no detail, no slash example. --Konoko 16:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Also, User talk:Konoko/Slash Command NavBoxes, 3 alternatives for current NavBoxes. Without the prefixes, neither plus "+" nor slash "/", the navbox looks clean on Firefox 3 Windows XP. I'm curious what it looks like in other browers. BRB, going to narnia. --Konoko 17:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Back from narnia, rendering looked ok on all browers. Which means that it looks just as cluttered or uncluttered -Konoko
Shades29A suggested having one detailed, one not. Added second article {{Navbox Pet Commands Reference}}. --Konoko 21:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)