User talk:Eabrace: Difference between revisions
imported>Garielle |
imported>Eabrace mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:Garielle|Garielle]] 01:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Garielle|Garielle]] 01:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:-''reply posted on [[User talk:Garielle#RE: City of Heroes Codex|User talk: Garielle]] | |||
Revision as of 22:07, 7 August 2010
 Archives |
Going Rogue
Will there be a Going Rogue/Praetorian wiki?
There's a bit of lore for that already that can be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Fish (talk • contribs) 00:55 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- -reply posted on User talk:The Fish
City Of Heroes Codex
Hey Eabrace,
I put this in the discussion page on Demo Editing/Understanding Demo Code as well, but will give you the short version here. It seems that Scuzzbopper has stopped maintaining the CoH Codex with the element information for demo editing. The last update comment from him on the site stated he had plans to port it over to the wiki. Is this something that we, as a community, want to go ahead and begin doing. Particularly with Going Rogue about to hit, there is going to be a lot of new information with new NPC models, maps, fx...you name it.
If so, and if you like, I can begin porting over the existing information (unless of course someone is already in the midst of doing that).
Garielle 01:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- -reply posted on User talk: Garielle