Category talk:Praetorians: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Draeth Darkstar (Created page with "I've gone through all the original Praetorians archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articl...") |
imported>Felderburg m (Signed comment) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've gone through all the original [[Praetorians]] archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articles, but there's no information regarding several of them in the new Praetoria content at all. | I've gone through all the original [[Praetorians (Enemy Group)]] archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articles, but there's no information regarding several of them in the new Praetoria content at all. | ||
So, I'm requesting any Going Rogue information, if it exists, regarding: | So, I'm requesting any Going Rogue information, if it exists, regarding: | ||
* [[Black Swan]] | * [[Black Swan]] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Siege]] | * [[Siege]] | ||
And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC) | And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Another issue to be raised - should there be a categorical distinction between, or sub-categorization for, (what are now called) the Praetors (the old archvillains), and Praetorians (including all the contacts/trainers/enemy groups/etc) in general? [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 05:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Just an FYI for... whoever I guess, the discussion as far as page titles go seems to be that the original Praetors group and their minions should be on the [[Praetorians (Enemy Group)]] page, since that's the group they appear as in-game. Other Praetorian groups, like [[Seers]], [[Devouring Earth (Praetorian)]], etc. should have their own enemy group page. '''All''' these groups do belong in the Praetorians ''category'', since they're from Praetoria and that's what the category is for, but individual pages offer distinction enough between Praetors and other people. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 06:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:37, 20 February 2014
I've gone through all the original Praetorians (Enemy Group) archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articles, but there's no information regarding several of them in the new Praetoria content at all. So, I'm requesting any Going Rogue information, if it exists, regarding:
And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. Draeth Darkstar 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Another issue to be raised - should there be a categorical distinction between, or sub-categorization for, (what are now called) the Praetors (the old archvillains), and Praetorians (including all the contacts/trainers/enemy groups/etc) in general? Draeth Darkstar 05:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just an FYI for... whoever I guess, the discussion as far as page titles go seems to be that the original Praetors group and their minions should be on the Praetorians (Enemy Group) page, since that's the group they appear as in-game. Other Praetorian groups, like Seers, Devouring Earth (Praetorian), etc. should have their own enemy group page. All these groups do belong in the Praetorians category, since they're from Praetoria and that's what the category is for, but individual pages offer distinction enough between Praetors and other people. Felderburg 06:37, 20 February 2014 (UTC)