Talk:Lord Recluse Strike Force: Difference between revisions
imported>Leandro |
imported>Talen Lee |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I'm all for it. I just tacked it at the end because the page '''is''' already a bit of a mess. Should also be edited to avoid showing a preference for a specific team makeup, and preferably to take importance away from team powers... a good team doesn't need them. this article actually would benefit from a full rewrite, but I don't really have the time for it (college starts in two weeks) -- [[User:Leandro|Leandro]] 01:13, 1 March 2007 (PST) | :I'm all for it. I just tacked it at the end because the page '''is''' already a bit of a mess. Should also be edited to avoid showing a preference for a specific team makeup, and preferably to take importance away from team powers... a good team doesn't need them. this article actually would benefit from a full rewrite, but I don't really have the time for it (college starts in two weeks) -- [[User:Leandro|Leandro]] 01:13, 1 March 2007 (PST) | ||
::On a related note, would it be worthwhile composing a 'Criticisms' section, which mentions such things as complaints about the bugged tech, the cookie-cutter Stonecore teams that typically approach it, and the claim the devs had that they COULDN'T finish it first? I'm sure you could find multiple quotes supporting either sides, and there's nothing saying you couldn't maintain neutrality between the two. --[[User:Talen Lee|Talen Lee]] | |||
Revision as of 11:51, 1 March 2007
OK, this article is nearly as complete as I can make it. There are only a few minor gaps in the mission text; I think everything else is good.
Kgiesing 17:33, 4 October 2006 (PDT)
I saw somewhere that Slinger, the Malta boss in Assault Malta Base is an Arch-Villain - is this true? Anyone know? Abyssal 22:45, 20 December 2006 (PST)
Formatting
Not that I have much needs to edit the article directly, but wouldn't it be better to have the final section be 'Strategies', a subcategory under it titled 'General Strategies' as the current GS section is, and another subcategory describing particular strategies, like the Mass Hypnosis Pull?
Under that heading, you could put such things as the Stonecore party (Stone Brute, 7 Corruptors), or the Stacked Domination party (8 Dominators) and so on. As it is, it seems a bit weird that the Hypnosis Pull gets its own section when it'd be tidier otherwise.
Just a suggestion, mind. --Talen Lee 16:15, 28 February 2007 (PST)
- I'm all for it. I just tacked it at the end because the page is already a bit of a mess. Should also be edited to avoid showing a preference for a specific team makeup, and preferably to take importance away from team powers... a good team doesn't need them. this article actually would benefit from a full rewrite, but I don't really have the time for it (college starts in two weeks) -- Leandro 01:13, 1 March 2007 (PST)
- On a related note, would it be worthwhile composing a 'Criticisms' section, which mentions such things as complaints about the bugged tech, the cookie-cutter Stonecore teams that typically approach it, and the claim the devs had that they COULDN'T finish it first? I'm sure you could find multiple quotes supporting either sides, and there's nothing saying you couldn't maintain neutrality between the two. --Talen Lee